Regional
Education Indicators Project
Second
Summit of the Americas
Santiago,
Chile
August
15th 2000
Country Responsible: Chile
with the cooperation of unesco/orealc
Regional Education Indicators
Project
Summit of the Americas
contents
Executive Summary
I. Project Frame of Reference
- Conceptual elements, model of relationship of indicators and
categories
- Project background & justification
- Construction of indicators within the region: current
situation
- Basic criteria for carrying out the project
- Expected results
II. PROJECT OBJECTIVES, COMPONENTS, &
STRATEGIES
General objective
Specific objectives
Descriptions of components
TIMETABLE, COSTS, & FINANCING
ANNEXES:
OBJECTIVES OF THE II SUMMIT OF THE AMERICAS AND INDICATOR
CATEGORIES
CATEGORIES AND INDICATORS
BUDGET
Executive Summary
BACKGROUND
At the Second Summit of the Americas (Chile,
April 1998), heads of state and government adopted a Plan for
Action for Education that urged countries to strengthen their
systems for assessing the quality of education and to establish
ways to compare some education indicators in the hemisphere. Some
initiatives in this area, such as the UNESCO/OECD World Education
Indicators Project, the work of MERCOSUR, and others are already
underway. The Regional Education Indicators Project proposed by
Chile in collaboration with UNESCO/OREALC seeks to construct
indicators by building upon these existing initiatives and to
create a coherent strategy so that all countries in the hemisphere
may work together in the development of comparable education
indicators.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED RESULTS
The objectives of the project are:
- to construct a set of basic comparable education indicators
for the Americas, taking into account existing initiatives
- to strengthen national systems of indicators and to develop
a technical assistance program, and
- to publish the indicators and encourage their use to assist
education policy making
It is expected that after three years of
project execution countries will have available a set of
comparable indicators � collected and analyzed with the active
involvement of participating countries. This will permit them to
make better and more informed policy decisions and to be able to
assess the progress in meetings of the Summit and in considering
their national goals.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
There is to be an initial meeting of interested
countries from throughout the hemisphere (the United States has
offered to host this plenary meeting in August 2000) in order to
jointly consider effective participation in the project. The
categories and indicators proposed will be fine-tuned during the
execution of the project. They will be broadened if necessary,
according to the interests of the countries, in the working groups
made up of country representatives. The initial set of categories
proposed by OREALC, in consultation with a number of countries,
includes:
- Demographic, social, and economic contexts of education and
a general description of education systems
- Human and financial resources in education
- Performance of education systems (access, participation,
efficiency)
- Quality of education (to include student achievement)
- Social impact of education (may include relationship of
education with the labor market, civic behavior, and others)
Based on the proposed categories, countries
shall decide in which categories they wish to participate.
Specialists from each interested country will be invited to take
part in the working groups that will be organized in each
category. UNESCO/OREALC will act as the technical secretariat or
general coordinator and will provide technical assistance to these
working groups. The groups will meet at least once a year and use
the internet to communicate their decisions regarding which
indicators are desirable and feasible for their countries within
the proposed categories and the common methodologies adopted for
the construction of these indicators. For the information
collection phase OREALC will offer coordinated technical
assistance to those countries that desire or need support to
obtain timely and reliable information. Once the information is
collected using the regular UNESCO Institute for Statistics
questionnaire, OREALC, in cooperation with the UNESCO Institute
for Statistics, will construct the indicators and will then
publish them, along with an analysis of the education situation of
the region.
During this initiative, the process of creation
and modification of the indicators will be considered to be active
and constant and will take a long-range perspective. The project
will last for three years. The original budget proposed by Chile
and UNESCO/OREALC is approximately US$2 million for the three
years, for which financial commitments have already been received
from various sources such that the project will be a shared effort
between countries, international organizations, and other donors.
Education Indicators Regional Project
Summit of the Americas
I. PROJECT FRAME OF REFERENCE
1. Conceptual elements, relation of indicators and categories
One of the most frequently discussed general
concepts in education is that of the objectives of education
systems. It is often said that among these objectives should be
the development of life skills, and preparation of students to
participate competitively in a increasingly globalized labor
market. Such skills open greater income opportunities and,
consequently, contribute to improve general economic equity and to
provide people with the tools required to be well-integrated and
participatory citizens in society (impact indicators).
Furthermore, in seeking to fulfill these over-all objectives, they
should be efficient, effective, equitable, and of high quality
(indicators of education system performance).
Internationally comparable education statistics
and indicators must consider the impact of education on society.
This means that such systems must take into account the priorities
of education as well as emerging issues in education policy. By so
doing, statistical systems remain politically relevant. Their
products will be taken into account in policy decision making.
This is, after all, the basic function of any education
information system.
Consequently, in order to assure coherence
between indicators to be developed, the following items should be
considered:
1. Analysis of the demographic, social, and
economic contexts within which education is developed. General
description of the education system
2. Human, material, and financial resources
invested in education
3. Access to, coverage of, and participation in
the system
4. Internal efficiency
5. Equality of educational opportunities
6. Quality of education: academic achievement
7. Social impact of education
Figure
Conceptual Framework of Indicators
A conceptual model of the relations between
different aspects of the indicators is presented in the figure above.
This model considers the context within which education is developed
and how it is organized. Then it considers the inputs directed at
education measured in terms of human and financial resources. It also
calls attention to the functioning of education itself. Finally, it
looks at the outputs of education in terms of achievement and social
impact which, in their turn, affect upon context.
Using this relational model, five wide categories
of indicators can be developed. They are described below. These
categories and their indicators seek to answer important questions
that appear during analysis and decision-making of education policy.
Among these questions are: Is the school-age population well served?
Is the education process efficient, guaranteeing that all share its
benefits? Are human and financial resources sufficient and of adequate
quality given the needs of the system? Is quality education being
achieved for all? What is the social impact of education?
Category 1: Demographic, Social, and Economic
Contexts and General Description of the Education System. The
indicators within this category give a general view of the context
within which education is developed. It considers as well the over-all
panorama of the organization of a country�s education system; the
activities and time period of education levels and the distinctive
characteristics of the system. It provides information as well
regarding the scope of education, taking into account the coverage
characteristics of the system of education.
Category 2: Resources for Education. The
indicators that make up this category allow us to estimate the
availability, characteristics, and distribution of human and financial
resources that contribute to the educational process. These indicators
allow us to calculate the availability, characteristics and
distribution of human resources in the educational sector - resources
that are considered to be key for the development of any system of
education. Similarly, indicators of material resources are necessary
in order to provide information regarding the system�s adequacy.
Indicators of cost and financing of education indicate the sources of
resources by separate sectors and/or participants as well as where the
resources are used. The relationship between resources dedicated to
education and educational results allow us to arrive at conclusions
regarding the effectiveness of education in terms of cost and quality
of resources utilized to provide education services.
Category 3: Education System Performance.
This category centers on the achievements of education systems: access
and participation of the population in education according to
different dimensions of equity (gender, geographic, ethno-linguistic,
disability, social and economic level). It also covers indicators
which consider the efficiency of the system, that is, the way the
education processes function in terms of academic failure, grade
repetition, and others.
Category 4: Quality of Education. The major
concern of current education policies centers on assuring quality with
equity, broadly understood. Academic achievement, expressed as results
on standardized and comparable tests is usually considered within this
category. There are, however, other possibilities, not yet well
developed, that can express education quality. This category requires
more attention in its relation with the indicators in Category 3,
particularly in regard to system efficiency.
The development of this category will be a shared
responsibility together with activities within the Regional Project of
Quality Assessment which is being carried out as follow up to the II
Summit of the Americas, in the Line coordinated by Brazil.
Category 5: Social Impact of Education.
This category offers a great opportunity for analysis of the interface
between education and society. It includes indicators relate to the impact
of education beyond the education system itself: on the labor market, on
social and economic equity, on civic behavior, among others. In spite of
their utility for decision-making, in many of their conceptual and
methodological aspects, indicators in this category are little developed
within the region. This, together with the small amount of information
processed and utilized within countries in order to make data comparable,
argues for making progress in developing the conceptual bases of this
category of indicators. This is a great challenge for the project
2. Background of and justification for the project
Review of diverse declarations of meetings of
presidents and of ministers of education during the last decade
highlights the high expectations that both politicians and the public
have for education. The II Summit of the Americas, held in Santiago,
Chile in 1998, created an Action Plan for Education within the region.
The major objectives sought by the plan are:
1. To assure that by the year 2010 all young
people have access to quality primary education, and that at least
75% of young people have access to quality secondary education,
with increasingly higher percentages of students who complete
secondary school.
2. To offer education opportunities to the
population in general.
In order to achieve these objectives, national
governments undertook to carry out a number of activities, including
assessing the state of education through a set of hemispheric
indicators.
On the multilateral level, governments committed
themselves to promoting country-to-country cooperation in the area of
education. They requested that international organizations support
programs that contribute to achieving the objectives outlined in the
Action Plan. Among these, of special interest are those that
strengthen regional cooperation in various areas considered, including
the up-dating of education statistics and the assessment of
educational quality.
In regard to education statistics and indicators,
during the Meeting of Ministers of Education of participating
countries of the II Summit of the Americas (Bras�lia, July 20-22,
1998), the Chilean Ministry of Education offered to coordinate the
design and execution of a regional project in the area of coordination
and assessment of education indicators, part of the Summit Line of
action coordinated by Brazil. At that meeting, a number of countries
manifested their interest in the project. Thus, in September 1998, the
Chilean Ministry of Education presented a preliminary project profile
to interested countries. The Interagency Committee recommended that
the proposal be prepared in collaboration with UNESCO, and later
during a meeting of the Plan of Action Follow Up Group (Mexico, March
1999), preparation was further advanced. In July of 1999, during a
meeting held in Washington, DC, the preliminary version of the project
developed by the Ministry of Education of Chile in cooperation with
UNESCO/OREALC was analyzed, and a strategy of action and possible
financing was developed. In a second meeting held in Washington (March
2000), the action plan and financial strategy were reviewed and
commitments made to make the project viable.
Seeking to respond to the recommendation of the
Inter-Agency Committee and to incorporate within the project design
advances made in the region through actions of the Regional
Information System (SIRI), the Ministry of Education of Chile and
OREALC/UNESCO have established an agreement to develop such tasks.
Collaboration with the UNESCO Institute for Statistics will come
through use of their information gathering questionnaires and work on
indicator construction (agreed to in a meeting in Jamaica, May 14-15,
2000)
3. Current situation of indicator construction
within the region
3.1 General considerations
Some sub-regions within Latin America and the
Caribbean have worked to strengthen the processes of integration in
the area of education through the creation or improvement of
information systems and indicators that make possible comparisons of
the behavior of national education systems. Different sub-regional
forums such as MERCOSUR, the Andr�s Bello Agreement, Central American
Educational and Cultural Coordination, the Organization of Eastern
Caribbean States and CARICOM have approached the theme of the
generation of comparable education indicators. In addition, countries
within the region participate in a number of regional and
international projects. Among these are the monitoring of the II
Summit of the Americas (Santiago, Chile, 1998), the assessment of the
Jomtien Education For All (EFA) commitments, and the UNESCO/OREALC
assessment of the Major Project in the Field of Education. Others
participate in initiatives at the world level such as the UNESCO/OECD
World Education Indicators Project and the UNESCO World Indicators
Program, sponsored by the new UNESCO Institute for Statistics, created
in 1999 with the support of the World Bank.
Statistics agencies within countries are
consequently subject to multiple demands for the construction of
indicators. They are responsible for the collection of statistics
(which consumes a large part of their time and resources). They
calculate indicators and disseminate the information. This is but one
dimension of their work. They also must respond to information demands
from users at the local, sub-national, national, and international
levels. The multiplicity of functions, combined with scarce resources,
limit possibilities for improving information in terms of internal
coherence and interpretive validity. It also reduces opportunities to
explore new fields that are important for education policy.
The multiplicity of initiatives for the generation
of indicators is a measure of current interest in the theme both by
countries as well as by international organizations. But it also
signals the need for coordination of these initiatives and for
creating more efficient procedures that give more order to data
collection efforts, thus avoiding duplication of effort within
countries attempting to construct comparable indicators.
This project seeks to link these separate efforts
and to create a synergy between international organizations and
national governments and is not a parallel, additional initiative. It
will bring together separate efforts, guiding them toward a common
goal: the generation of a set of basic, comparable indicators within
the region. In this, it recognizes that the MERCOSUR countries already
have comparable systems of information and statistical indicators,
while the Central American countries have been able to jointly produce
an annual report. In the Seminar Workshop on Education Statistics held
in Cartagena de Indias (September, 1998), the member countries of the
Andr�s Bello Agreement committed themselves to creating a set of
comparable indicators that would track the performance of the
respective education systems.
3.2 Some recent background
The Regional Seminar Workshop on Education
Statistics and Indicators in Latin America and the Caribbean met in
January 1999. During these meetings, representatives of each
sub-region presented reports on progress and problems the area of
statistics and comparable indicators. From these presentations one can
arrive at the following conclusions:
- There is a need to establish a system that facilitates the
construction of indicators of the cost and financing of
education.
- There are problems regarding the reliability of
information and of estimates.
- There is a lack of disagregated population projections.
- There is a lack of pre-school education statistics.
- There are subjects that should be studied in more depth in
future work plans in the region. Among these are: cost and
financing of education; transition and the flux of the
school population; indicators of infrastructure and
capacity; identification of sources of information by
indicator, hours worked and human resources; population
(urban and rural definitions and projections); economically
active population; and indicators for the population outside
the education system.
Among the agreements and recommendations of the
January, 1999 seminar, of special note are (1) the selection of a
basic set of 32 agreed-upon indicators for the region; (2) the need to
adopt various mechanisms for cooperation; and (3) strengthening the
relationships between Central American countries, the Andr�s Bello
Agreement countries, and those that make up MERCOSUR to generate a
synergy in the construction of internationally comparable and useful
indicators for the definition of education policies.
Similarly, in the recently held sub-regional
preparatory workshops for the assessment of the Education For All
program, participants noted difficulties in obtaining comparable
indicators among countries. These are:
- Countries have different systems for collecting statistics
- Countries use different terminology and definitions
- The methods for calculating indicators may be different in
respect to those suggested by EFA
- There is a lack of complete information on early childhood
education
- In some cases, there is a lack of information by age
- There is a lack of information about whether teachers have or do
not have degrees
- Differences in the availability of information for some years
from national reports (1994,�95,�96, etc.)
- Literacy rates for recent years are estimates because census
data in the region date from the beginning of the decade. More
up-to-date information is expected from the year 2000 census.
There is a need to use estimates or complementary sources.
- Distinct degrees of reliability in official statistical data
- Non-availability of non-agregated information by sex may make it
difficult to compare data with other regions
- Statistical systems of countries receive data requests from
diverse international organizations
- Problems of availability and comparability of learning
achievement indicators
This gives us an idea of the situation in countries
in regard to current initiatives. Such information will be considered
in the preparation and execution of the Regional Project.
4. Basic criteria for carrying out the project
The Education Indicators Regional Project will meet
certain basic criteria. These are as follows:
- It will organize and coordinate the efforts of countries, making
use of experience in the generation of comparable education
indicators, making the process more efficient and effective. It
will promote country-to-country cooperation, based on the
strengths and positive experiences found in previous studies.
- It will be constructed based upon the educational priorities of
the region as expressed both at the Summit of the Americas, within
various meetings of ministers of education, of country
specialists, as well as those that appear during development of
the project.
- It will use a gradual approach in regard to adherence of
countries to the Project, depending upon i) their interests and
abilities to participate, ii) the development and gradual
incorporation if necessary, of new indicators into the basic
program. At the end of the project it is hoped that all countries
in the region will have developed a complete set of indicators.
- Together with the construction of indicators, the conceptual
definitions and methodology of which will be part of the Project
preparation, effort will be made to develop indicators for areas
which currently lack conceptual and methodological clarity. This
is particularly the case for the area of equity and of the social
impact of education.
Expected Results
After three years of operation it is expected that
the Project,:
- Will have provided countries with a set of comparable education
indicators - developed with their active participation - that will
permit them to make better education policy decisions.
- Will have encouraged the use of quality information in education
decision-making.
- Will have created a continuing process of strengthening
statistical systems of countries within the region, and that this
process will soon result in a specific program of technical
cooperation to assure its continuation.
- Will have contributed to the strengthening of a on-going
regional education information system.
II. OBJECTIVES ANDCOMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT
In order to reach the long-term goal of the
creation of a permanent education information system in the Americas,
the project has defined the following objectives
1. General Objective
In line with the objectives established in the
Action Plan of the II Summit of the Americas, this project has the
general objective of producing and analyzing a set of basic comparable
indicators within the region that will contribute to education policy
decision-making by national governments.
2. Specific Objectives
a. To construct a basic set of comparable
indicators in education, using a common methodology, which will
promote to unify efforts in this area on the part of international
organizations, sub-regional organizations, and of the governments in
the region.
b. To provide technical support to countries for
the construction of the indicators and to identify the current state
within countries of statistical systems in education. Such information
will provide a basis for developing programs of technical cooperation.
c. To encourage the use of information generated by
the set of basic comparable education indicators, which will be
presented periodically to present the current state and analysis of
education within the region.
3. Project Components and their Descriptions
In order to achieve the above objectives, three
complementary components have been identified:
a. Construction of comparable indicators.
b. Technical cooperation with countries in the
development of comparable indicators.
c. Dissemination and analysis of the indicators
a. Construction of comparable indicators
This component seeks to select, develop, and
calculate a basic set of comparable education indicators, taking into
consideration the basic criteria mentioned above, and emphasizing the
following:
- making use of national efforts for indicator development,
certifying methodology and simplifying calculation procedures.
- following a coherent method indicator analysis.
- computation of indicators should be within the means of most
counties in the region within the time frame established by the
Summit.
- the basic set of indicators may vary as necessary in order to
embrace emerging themes in education policy that may be of
interest to countries.
The educational levels proposed to be given
particular attention are
1. Pre-school (coverage and requirements)
2. Primary education (required cycle)
3. Secondary education (education cycle following
primary and which is a gateway to more advanced levels or directly
into the labor market, or both).
In addition, phases for the development of
indicators are identified, each with its respective activities: a
preparatory phase, and a construction phase.
1. Preparatory Phase: dedicated to the
selection of the basic set of indicators proposed to countries by
those responsible for the project and dissemination and discussion of
their content in order to encourage participation in the project by
countries of the Americas.
The activities foreseen for this phase are:
Activity: Selection of the indicators that
will be included in the project and their respective methodologies.
Given that the project seeks to create a "system of comparable
indicators for the region" taking advantage of existing efforts
the preparatory phase will take into consideration, according to the
categories of indicators presented, the development of and proposals
for indicators already undertaken by the countries themselvesand by
international organizations that are working in this area, in
particular OREALC�s SIRI project and UNESCO Institute for Statistics�
work, taking into account the feasibility of construction with
available information.
The set of indicators to be included in this
project should be such that required data can be collected by
countries with diverse levels of development of their information
systems and with diverse priorities. They should be interested in
collecting such data and, according to the "gradual"
criterion defined for carrying out the project, to construct, year by
year, the indicators within the set. Thus, international comparisons
for each indicator will in time include an increasingly growing number
of countries. To this effect, the project foresees the functioning of
working groups that will be described below, in which countries will
validate and select those indicators most pertinent to their national
circumstances.
Consequently, the basic indicator set selected in
this preparatory phase takes into consideration the existing
experiences, concerns, and priorities of an important number of
countries. They provide answers the major questions of education
decision makers and of the community. Annex 1 presents the basic
indicator set selected in this category.
The indicators to be included in the project will
have a single methodology in terms of comparability-definition, range,
and computation algorithm. This may require adopting or adapting
selected aspects of currently used methodologies that are considered
most technically appropriate among existing initiatives.
The preparatory phase of the project will also
identify software and communication compatibility requirements among
countries.
Inform countries about the project and invite them
to participate Because the countries of the Americas will be
the major actors in this project, it is of key importance that they
know and discuss its objectives, procedures, and set of
internationally comparable indicators and methodologies. The countries
will be invited to participate actively � and gradually, if they so
desire - in the construction together of a set of comparable
indicators. To that end, agreement has been reached with the UNESCO
Institute for Statistics that its next two workshops on dissemination
of questionnaires and use of the ISCED classification will offer an
opportunity to introduce the categories and indicators proposed by
this project. 2. Indicator construction phase , dedicated to
collecting information from countries and the processing of the
information by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics in strict
coordination with OREALC and the Ministry of Education of Chile.
This foresees the following activities:
Joining the project: The administrators of
the project will seek the opinions of the ministers of education as part of
the response of countries to the invitation to participate from the Ministry
of Education of Chile and by OREALC.
Establishment and functioning of Working Groups
Countries are the major actors in the project. Therefore, we propose that
Working Groups be created. Made up of specialists, they will have the following
responsibilities:
� They will consider the conceptual categories of
the project and their respective indicators. They will reflect upon
their importance and will discuss in depth the specific methodologies
to be used in their construction.
� They will exchange experiences and provide
technical assistance in regard to the use of information, supporting
countries in considering their possibilities for working with the
proposed indicators.
� They will collect information about and discuss
past experiences of countries in working with the selected indicators
as well as others that may be incorporated as the project progresses.
� They will review and discuss forms of analysis
and dissemination of the constructed indicators as well as the
possibilities of their use in education policy making.
� Additional indicators will added to the basic
set in the future. During project execution advances will be made in
the identification and development of other indicators pertinent to
the region.
The project proposes to create five specific
working groups, following the categories of indicators described
above. A first phase will emphasize the work of groups 1, 2, and 3,
given that the last two will require further conceptual development
and inputs external to the project. (See Annex 2)
Group 1: Demographic, social, and economic
context and general description of education systems
Group 2: Resources in education
Group 3: Education system performance
Group 4: Quality of education
Group 5: Impact of education
Countries joining the project will define how they
wish to participate in the proposed working groups, according to their
own interests. They will nominate the specialists who will make up the
working groups.
The working groups will operate in two
complementary modes: 1) through meetings which will take place at
least once per year, and 2) through a computer network using new
communication technologies. Their work will be coordinated and
encouraged by UNESCO/OREALC through its role as technical advisor to
the project and will also have cooperation from the UNESCO Institute
for Statistics The functioning of the working groups will begin with a
meeting at which a WORKING NETWORK will be created that will
facilitate the process of ongoing interaction between countries and
the specialists responsible for the components of the project.
Subsequently, there will be annual meetings to provide continuity to
designated tasks of the working groups.
Preparation of questionnaires Maximum
possible use will be made of already existing instruments (UNESCO Institute for
Statistics, OECD/UNESCO and others). Additions will be only for what is required
for the construction of pre-determined indicators that is not present in
available instruments.
Data collection. Use will be made of
currently available means of electronic questionnaire generation. After a review
of current procedures for data collection used in projects within the region
(UNESCO/OECD and others) advantages and disadvantages of currently used data
collection instruments were identified and it was agreed to use the information
collected by the UNESCO Institute for Statistics through their statistical
questionnaires. Strict coordination with the UNESCO Institute will make it
possible to avoid the duplication of effort of data entry by countries.
Eventually, the project will directly collect only data necessary for the
calculating indicators proposed in the first phase of the projectwhich are not
included in the UNESCO questionnaire or from other sources. Definition of
education levels will follow the International Standardized Classification of
Education Data (ISCED), officially approved in 1997.
Data processing Calculation and automatic
validation of the indicators for participating countries will take place through
the program of work of the UNESCO Institute for Statistics, in coordination with
OREALC. OREALC will provide periodic reports to countries to provide feedback on
indicator construction and their dissemination.
b. Providing technical support to countries for
construction of comparable indicators
This component seeks to provide technical support
to countries for the construction of the indicators. Taking advantage
of the progress gained within the working groups, and in coordination
cooperation with countries, we will carry out an up-to-date diagnosis
of the availability of information for computing the indicators.
Support will be given to those who require and request it. As a result
of this component we expect the development of a program proposal for
longer term technical cooperation to be carried out at the end of this
project.
A review of the current state of national systems
of education statistics and indicators is a necessary step given
thatthese systems will be the major sources of production and analysis
of information. In Latin America and the Caribbean some strengths and
weaknesses of national statistical systems stand out. The major
strengths are:
- There are laws in the countries that require the periodic
collection of statistics
- Ministries of education have offices dedicated to generating
statistics for the sector
- Countries use mostly the same variables for computing basic
indicators
- There is political will and support from international
organizations
- Potential access to technologies
� National education statistics offices have the
possibility of accessing complementary sources of information
Among major weaknesses are:
- Human and financial resources are scarce.
- Absence of common conceptual framework, resulting in problems
with concepts, methodologies, and definitions.
- Lack of a tradition among policy makers of using information
- Lack of national and international coordination in projects for
developing indicators
- Operational difficulties in countries to obtain data on costs
and financing
- Unavailability of data for indicators of efficacy and equity
- Tendency on the part of education statistics offices to limit
information they collect to that which is purely education related
and to ignore other data sources.
This component proposes to carry out the following
activities:
Carry out a regional survey of the
availability of basic statistical information for developing
indicators within each country. By contrasting information
available nationally with the proposed indicators and their
pre-established computation methodologies (with the participation of
technical experts from each country) throughan analysis of the
statistical information that countries provide to UNESCO, we can
determine the availability of data, which variables are collected and
their level of disaggregation. In addition, we will see where
information gaps occur. The first phase of this diagnostic activity
will take place during the two workshops to take place in July of
2000.
Identify those countries which most require
and demand technical cooperation in order to support them in the
development of indicators. The purpose here is to have a point
of reference in order to prepare the project�s responses to demands
for cooperation from participating countries. Identification will be
based on a preliminary analysis of the current state of national
statistical services, on the results of the development by countries
of 18 assessment indicators of the EFA program, and on the opinion of
the country�s specialists about the country�s strengths and
weaknesses. We will also take into account experiences of
participating countries in the UNESCO/OECD World Education Indicators
Project and the results of the workshops to take place in cooperation
with the UNESCO Statistics Institute.
Visit countries that require and request
cooperation in order to provide technical support for the methodology
of comparable indicator development. The visits will serve to
identify the availability and characteristics of information for
indicator computation. The visits will seek:
- to determine in situ and in direct contact with those
responsible, what information is collected, how it is generated,
and characteristics of data that countries process and publish.
- To identify difficulties national statistical systems face in
data collection and processing in the areas of feasibility,
reliability, and comparability with other countries. The origins
or causes of such difficulties will be assessed as well. This task
can be carried out through interviews with responsible authorities
as well as through on site observation of the data generation
process. In the latter case, one can analyze how primary data is
collected, methodological norms, competency of personnel, quality
of material resources, etc.
- To offer technical assistance to help resolve difficulties and
to contribute in identifying possible sources of financial
resources to improve the system.
Identify the need and interest that exist in
countries to participate in the technical cooperation process aimed at
improving national education statistics systems. Since an
expected result of the project is the development of a program of technical
cooperation that strengthens national statistical systems in the region, it is
important to identify country needs and interests for such an activity. The
demands and needs for technical cooperation will be products of the diagnostic
reports and on site visits. They will also come from the experiences of
technical cooperation foreseen in the joint SECAB/OREALC program and others,
like those in the Caribbean subregion. The formulation of a detailed regional
program of technical cooperation will be directed at technical training in
education indicators and statistics and at the modernization of management of
information, among other areas.
c. Dissemination and analysis of the indicators
In order to make an effective contribution to the
development of education systems in the region it is necessary to
interpret and analyze the data at two levels. The first level has to
do with understanding the meaning of the indicators and using
available instruments properly. The second level refers to the use of
an adequate theory to serve as a guide in formulating questions and
guaranteeing the consistency of answers. What is needed is a model
that aids in interpreting the relations among different variables that
impact upon education.
The objective of this component is to provide
countries with comparative information that is reliable, relevant,
timely, and assessable and which will make education policy decision
making more effective in the region. Indicators and statistical data
will be organized to be published periodically (annually or
biannually) and complemented by a full analysis for the region that
can incorporate information from relevant studies and research carried
out within the region. In addition, other information from both the
education sector and from secondary sources will be included which
will provide more complete analyses of problems, facilitate
understanding and, therefore, make possible more adequate policy
analysis and response.
Success in policy making requires analysis and
interpretation of information that allow education decision-makers to
differentiate key problems from those that are passing and short-term,
and to have as a reference the situation of other countries in the
region.
In synthesis, it is suggested that two activities
be carried out
a. An analysis on the regional level,
integrating other information coming from studies and research
within the region.
b. A periodic regional publication, in
collaboration with each participating country, that treats the
indicators and their analysis. In addition, use will be made of
instruments established under the framework of the Summit, such as a
Web page of indicators, to disseminate information and analyses coming
from the project.
- TIMETABLE, COST AND FINANCING
Activities |
Preparation |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
1 SEM |
2 SEM |
1 SEM |
2 SEM |
1 SEM |
2 SEM |
1 SEM |
2 SEM |
Project Preparation Stage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. In each category, selection of indicators
and their methodologies |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Information sent to countries and
invitations to participate in the project |
X |
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Obtain financing |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Execution Stage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Construction of indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Process of countries joining the project & opinions
regarding indicators they consider most important
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
|
- Creation and functioning of Working Groups (technical
meetings and contacts through Web
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
- Preparation of on-line questionnaires
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
- Collection of information from countries and from other
sources (UNESCO Statistics Institute)
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
- Generation of data base in UNESCO Statistics Institute
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
- Data entry and processing at UNESCO
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
- Return to countries for revision
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
X |
- Final preparation of indicators
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
2 Technical cooperation with countries for
development of comparable indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
- Identification of countries that require cooperation and
on-site visits
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
- Preparation of proposal for program of future cooperation
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
3.Dissemination and analysis of indicators |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Assessment Stage |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
The estimated cost of the preparation phase of the
project is approximately US$190,000, which is broken down by
institution, concept, and amount in the following chart:
Instituci�n |
Concepto |
Monto estimado |
Ministry of Education of Chile |
Travel
Labor |
US$ 15.700
US$ 8.600 |
OREALC |
Travel
Labor |
US$ 10.250
US$ 51.480 |
SECAB (Convenio Andres Bello) |
Statistics workshop (October 1999)
Travel to Washington, DC (March 2000, 2
people) |
US$ 20.000
US$ 3.000 |
U.S. Department of Education |
July 1999 meeting
March 2000 meeting |
US$ 15.000
US$ 15.000 |
UNESCO Kingston |
Travel to Washington, DC (March 2000, 1
person)
Meeting in Jamaica (May 2000) |
US$ 1.100
US$ 5.000 |
UNESCO Statistics Institute |
Workshops
|
US$ 28.000 |
Other countries: Brazil, Canada, Mexico |
Travel to two technical meetings in
Washington, DC
Travel from Brazil to Chile (August 1999) |
US$ 15.000
US$ 3.200 |
Education Indicators Regional Project
Summit of the Americas
Total Budget by Component (totals in US$)
General project coordination 382,760
Component 1: Development of Indicators 810,240
Component 2: Technical Support to Countries 539,040
Component 3: Dissemination and Analysis 85,000
Unforeseen and Overhead (10% est.) 181,704
Total 1,998,744
Education Indicators Regional Project
Summit of the Americas
Total Budget by Line (totals in US$)
Consultants 671,000
Transportation & per diem 134,000
Computing equipment 12,000
Meetings 863,000
Communications 47,000
Publications 78,000
Distribution 12,000
Unforeseen & Overhead 181,704
Total 1,998,744
For their part, countries will have project costs
estimated as equivalent to two full time people during 2 months for
each year of project execution. This comes to an estimated value of
US2,500 per month per person. Each country, therefore, will be
responsible for personnel costs equivalent to US$10,000 for the entire
project. Considering 40 countries, the over-all cost is approximately
US$40,000.
IV. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT
In order to define the organization and management
of the project, we need to consider the roles and relations of
different participants.
Participant |
Role |
Countries of the region |
- Identify the indicators they consider to be priority to
begin their participation �criterion of gradual entry-.
Depending upon interests and feasibility, gradually increase
coverage of indicators.
- Actively participate in the execution and assessment of
results, fulfilling their responsibilities and commitments
during the development of the project.
- Actively participate in the Working Groups, according to
their interests and priorities. Development of working
networks with face-to-face meetings and internet
communication.
- Establish permanent coordination teams/or counterparts in
each country to serve as designated contacts for all
exchanges of information, inquiries, discussions, and offers
and requests for cooperation arising from the Regional
Project. The creation of these coordinating teams is key in
order to obtain needed ease of communication among
participating countries.
|
Country responsible for education statistical
indicators project design and execution � Chile |
- Policy and technical development of project.
- Carry forward policy component to reach agreements
regarding working plan of project.
- Establish mechanisms and cooperative agreements to carry
forward project
- Monitoring and assessment of the project for Summit
authorities.
|
Coordinador de la L�nea de Indicadores
Educativos Estad�sticos y de Evaluaci�n- Brasil |
- Promote political support for the succesful achievement of
Line objectives
- Promote coordination between statistical indicators
project (Chile) and assessment indicators (Brazil)
|
Technical cooperation agency: UNESCO/OREALC
|
*Promote technical support for the design and
execution of the project by, for example:
1. Design and implement technical cooperation
to the countries
- Facilitating technical agreements between
subregional initiatives and with all countries in the
region and establish linds between the Summit Project
and world initiatives on education indicators.
- Design and implement and effective and efficient
working model
- Coordinate the Working Groups made up of country
representatives
- Collect information with UNESCOInstitute for
Statistics
- Compute indicators with UNESCOInstitute for
Statistics
- Prepare analysis and dissemination of indicators in
coordination with UNESCOInstitute for Statistics
|
Technical and financial cooperating doner
organizations for development and execution of the project. |
- Technical and financial support for the project
- Provide means for countries to utilize resources currently
designatied for institutional strengthening of mininstries
of education statistical offices IDB and World Bank and
multilateral and bilateral agencies)
|
The Regional Education Indicators Project has the
technical support of UNESCO-OREALC, which will collaborate with the
countries in the preparation and execution of the project and to which
will carry out the technical tasks, specifically in regard to the
selection of indicators, standardization of terminology, coordination
of Specialized Working Groups, preparation of data collection on
instruments, collection of information, computation and analysis of
indicators with the UNESCO Institute for Statistics, review and
preparation of reports, and will seek agreements for the publication
and dissemination of the results.
In
order to carry out its technical aspects, the Regional Indicators Project will
have the following organization:
Since UNESCO-OREALC will be responsible for
developing the technical aspects of the Regional Indicators Project,
the formal relationship with the Ministry of Education of Chile and
with other countries of the Summit will be the responsibility of the
Director of the Regional Office Of Education of UNESCO for Latin
America and the Caribbean. The technical team will be headed by an
Executive Director, who will be responsible for project coordination.
In addition, a Coordinator for Indicator Development will be
contracted, as well as a person responsible for publication. Each of
these individuals will direct consultants under their responsibility.
The Technical Support component will answer directly to the executive
director. The project will require two secretaries for logistical
support during project implementation.
ANNEX I
Objectives of the II Summit of the Americas and
Indicator Categories
Using as a basis the categories of indicators
described above, we have developed a matrix that helps visualize the
points in common between the objectives of the II Summit of the
Americas and the categories of the projected study.
Relation between objectives of the Summit and
categories of indicators
Relation between objectives of the Summit and
categories of indicators
Objectives of the II Summit of the Americas |
Indicator Category |
Level of development in the project |
- Carry out compensatory and inter-sectoral education
policies, with special attention to the most
vulnerable groups
- Establish, in accord with legislation, education
strategies directed at multicultural societies.
- Strengthen education management and institutional
capacity on the national, regional, local, and school
levels.
|
Category 1; General description of the
education system and context. Category 3: Performance and
participation with equity;
Internal efficiency |
Indicators in Annex I will be constructed,
according to the interest of each country. |
- Developed integrated programs for professional training
for school teachers and administrators
- Promote access to and more efficient use of information
and communication technologies.
- Promote scholarships and exchange of students, teachers,
and education researchers, and administrators.
|
Category 2: Education resources |
|
- Assess the quality of education using national,
sub-national, and sub-regional indicators
- Incorporate within education democratic principles, of
human rights, gender equality, peace, tolerance, and respect
for the environment and natural resources.
|
Category 4: Quality of education |
Goal will be advances through studies to
identify the diverse means of assessing the quality of education
today in the region and in the world. Available information on
measurement of academic achievement in the region will be used
in order to present comparable information |
- Strengthen the training and education of workers taking
into account the adoption of new technologies.
|
Category 5: Social impact of education |
Goal will be advanced with studies of social
impact indicators. |
ANNEX 2
Categories and Basic Indicator Set
Category I. Social and Economic Context and
Description of the Education System
Sub-Category 1: Demographic, Social, and Economic
Context
Total population, by age from 0 to 24 years and for age groups
from 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40�49, 50-59, and 60 and above.
Urban and rural population.
GDP per capita.
Subjects to be analyzed by working groups:
-Population by ethnic group and/or language
-Distribution of income
-Others
Sub-Category 2: Description of the Education System
Age range for obligatory schooling.
Number of hours in school week.
Number of hours in school year
Category II. Resources in Education
Sub-Category 1: Human Resources
Teachers possessing required academic degree(s).
Students per classroom teacher.
Average annual initial teacher salary expressed as percentage of
GDP per Capita.
Subjects to be analyzed by working groups:
- Interest and feasibility of constructing
indicators regading classroom teachers as a percent of all teachers
and students per section (class, year, term).
Sub-Category 2: Financial Resources Invested in
Education
Total expenditures for education expressed as percentage of GDP.
Total public expenditures for education expressed as percentage of
GDP.
Private expenditures for education expressed as percentage of GDP.
Total public expenditures for education expressed as percentage of
total public expenditures.
Current public expenditures for education expressed as percentage
of public expenditures for education.
Public expenditures for capital expenditures for education
expressed as percentage of public expenditures for education.
Percentage of public expenditures for education by education
level.
Public expenditures for education per student by education level
expressed as percentage of GDP per capita.
Sub-Category 3: Material resources for education
Subjects to be analyzed by working groups:
-Indicators for infrastructure, physical plant
space, school equipment
-Others
Category III. Performance of the Education System.
Scope and Efficiency of Education
Sub-Category 1: Scope of Education
Gross enrollment rate for the first grade of primary education.
Net enrollment rate for the first grade of primary education.
Net enrollment in primary and secondary education.
Gross schooling rate by educational level.
Net schooling rate by age from 0-24.
Sub-Category 2: Internal Efficiency
Passing rate by level and grade.
Subjects to be analyzed by working groups:
- Cohort models and indicators derived from these
- Percentage of above-age students by grade
Category IV. Quality of Education
Depends upon the Assessment line of action
as determined in the Action Plan for Education of the
Second Summit of the Americas.
Category V. Social
Impact of Education
Literacy rate of the adult population.
Level of instruction within the adult population.
Subjects to be analyzed by working groups:
- Impact of educationn in the labor market, for
income, in civic behavior
- Others
AGENDA OF COMPLEMENTARY THEMES TO BE ANALYZED BY
WORKING GROUPS
- Category I. - In the category of demographic, social,
and economic context, besides the information and indicators selected in the
basic set, during execution of the project progress should be made in the
identification and development of parallel economic and social indicators in the
region. Aspects such as the distribution of income and cultural, ethnic, and
linguistic diversity are contextual characteristics of great importance for
analysis of education. It is for this reason that it is considered imperative
that the working groups review and analyze these aspects in order to propose new
indicators for this category; ones that will complement and enrich the initial
selection.
- Category II. - Sub-category 3. -
For material
resources such as equipment and infrastructure, in view of
the fact that these contribute to the quality of education output, it is
important that the working group review and analyze current availability of
information and methodological development in this area in order to move forward
in the selection and development of indicators for the region. It is extremely
important that these activities concentrate on identifying those resources that
most affect educational results and that the group analyze the possibility of
constructing such indicators, taking into account the complex nature of making
them comparable between countries.